Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Controlled Release Formulation of Indomethacin Prepared With Bee Glue Extracts

S Honary1 , P Ebrahimi2, F Naghibi3, M Chaigani1

1Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Sari; 2Gonbad Institute of Higher Education Center, P.O. Box 163, Gonbad; 3Traditional Medicine & Materia Medica Research Center (TMRC) Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

For correspondence:-  S Honary   Email: shonary@mazums0ac.ir   Tel:0098 912145 2220

Received: 27 December 2010        Accepted: 30 July 2011        Published: 23 October 2011

Citation: Honary S, Ebrahimi P, Naghibi F, Chaigani M. Controlled Release Formulation of Indomethacin Prepared With Bee Glue Extracts. Trop J Pharm Res 2011; 10(5):543-550 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v10i5.2

© 2011 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To prepare and evaluate new sustained release formulations of indomethacin based on extracts of propolis (bee glue).
Methods: Standardization of propolis (bee glue) extracts was performed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and determination of the values of fat and fixed oils. Several indomethacin capsule formulations (F1 - F18) containing varying amounts of chloroform (0.75 - 75 mg) and ethanol extracts (30 - 75 mg) of propolis were prepared. The dissolution rate of the formulations was evaluated by USP dissolution (rotating basket) method I  and the release data subjected to various kinetic models. Probable interaction between the drug and propolis extracts was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
Results: The results show that, although the release rate of formulations F1 - F7 did not show any significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to F18 as blank, the other formulations did. DSC results indicate that incorporation of propolis extract in the formulations lowered indomethacin melting point by between 5 and 30 ºC, indicating interaction between the drug and the waxy extract. Kinetic analysis of the in vitro release data of the formulations showed that the best-fit drug release model varied with the drug:propolis extract ratio of the formulations. 
Conclusion: Formulation F13 (with equal proportion of drug and bee glue extract) came out best from the dissolution test for indomethacin extended-release capsules as it exhibited zero order kinetics.  This fpormulation is therefore suitable for further development as a matrix formulation for controlled  release.

Keywords: Propolis (bee glue), Indomethacin, Controlled release, Zero order kinetics, Waxy materials

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates